UN Security Council

7353rd Meeting

Provisional Agenda: The situation in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

 

22 December 2014

 

UN 안전보장이사회

제7353차 회의

잠정 의제: DPRK에서의 상황

 

2014. 12. 22.

 

Public meeting in connection with the letter dated 5 December 2014 from the representatives of Australia, Chile, France, Jordan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Republic of Korea, Rwanda, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council (S/2014/872).

 

http://webtv.un.org/meetings-events/security-council/watch/the-situation-in-the-democratic-peoples-republic-of-korea-security-council-7353rd-meeting/3958194597001

 

 

[Audio: English Interpretation/음성: 영어 통역]

http://downloads.unmultimedia.org/radio/library/ltd/mp3/2014/1271988.mp3

 

Keywords: DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA, JEFFREY FELTMAN, IVAN SIMONOVIC, HUMAN RIGHTS, CYBER SECURITY

 

 

[Excerpts/발췌]

 

http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/unifeed/2014/12/un-dprk-16

 

The UN Security Council today kicked off a debate on  human rights in the Peoples' Democraticp People’s Republic of Korea, with a call that a case be referred to the International Criminal Court.

 

[Excerpts/발췌]

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQEy9IBehfA

 

Statement by H.E. Mr. OH Joon, Permanent Representative of the Republic of Korea to the United Nations

 

오준 주유엔 대한민국 대사 발언


 

Letter (S/2014/872)

 

S/2014/872

Distr.: General

5 December 2014

Original: English

 

Letter dated 5 December 2014 from the representatives of Australia, Chile, France, Jordan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Republic of Korea, Rwanda, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Security Council

 

 

         We the undersigned members of the Security Council — Australia, Chile, France, Jordan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Republic of Korea, Rwanda, the United Kingdom and the United States — are deeply concerned about the situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.

          We are particularly concerned by the scale and gravity of human rights violations detailed in the comprehensive report undertaken by the Human Rights Council commission of inquiry on human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (A/HRC/25/63), as contained in document S/2014/276. These violations threaten to have a destabilizing impact on the region and the maintenance of international peace and security.

          Therefore, we write to request that the situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea be formally placed on the Council’s agenda without prejudice to the item on non-proliferation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. We request a meeting of the Security Council on the situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, pursuant to rule 2 of the Council’s provisional rules of procedure, and request that a senior official from the Secretariat and a senior official from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights formally brief the Council under that agenda item, which will enable Council members to receive further information from the Secretariat on this situation and its implications for international peace and security.

                 We would be grateful if the present letter could be circulated as a document of the Security Council, with a view to considering this agenda item as early as possible in the month of December. 


Security Council Media Stakeout

 2014. 12. 22.

 

 안보리 기자회견

 

2014. 12. 22.


Informal comments to the media by H.E. Mr. OH Joon, Permanent Representative of the Republic of Korea to the United Nations on the situation of Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)

 

오준 주유엔 대한민국 대표부 대사

 

Informal comments to the media by Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights, Ivan Šimonović, on the situation of Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK)

 

이반 시모노비치 인권담당 사무차장보

 

http://webtv.un.org/meetings-events/security-council/watch/ivan-Šimonović-on-the-situation-of-human-rights-in-the-democratic-peoples-republic-of-korea-security-council-media-stakeout-22-december-2014/3957338562001

 

 

Ban Ki-moon on the situation of Human Rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

 

반기문 UN 사무총장

 

http://webtv.un.org/topics-issues/watch/ban-ki-moon-on-the-situation-of-human-rights-in-the-democratic-peoples-republic-of-korea-media-stakeout-22-december-2014/3956868844001


[Media - Press encounters]

Off-the-Cuff

Secretary-General's press encounter on Ebola (full transcript)

New York, 22 December 2014

 

(...)

Q: Secretary-General, the Security Council will later be holding its first ever meeting on the situation of human rights in North Korea. It’s an issue you’re well acquainted on. Can you tell us in your view how the human rights situation in North Korea should be an issue of international concern?

SG: I’m aware of this and I’ve been closely following this situation on the DPRK [Democratic People’s Republic of Korea]’s human rights issues.

Speaking broadly in general terms, human rights is one of the three pillars of the United Nations Charter and that should be the basis of all our work. When there is no human rights promotion and protection, there cannot be, it’s very difficult to think about political stability as well as sustainable development. That is why human rights should be given the highest priority for any countries in dealing with United Nations principles. When there is a serious, gross violation of human rights, then it can create a lot of movement of people fleeing the countries, and it creates refugee issues and [displacement] problems. Then, it affects the political stability and it affects development. Therefore, the United Nations regards this with the highest priority on protecting human rights. I am closely following what kind of decision the Security Council will take on this matter.


[Meetings Coverage and Press Releases/회의취재 및 보도자료]

 

22 December 2014

 

SC/11720

 

Security Council, in Divided Vote, Puts Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s Situation on Agenda following Findings of Unspeakable Human Rights Abuses

 

안보리, DPRK의 상황을 의제로 상정

7353rd Meeting (PM)

 

Concerted action by the international community was needed following a Human Rights Council report on appalling, systematic abuses in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, high United Nations officials told the Security Council today, following a procedural vote of 13 in favour to 2 against (China, Russian Federation), with 2 abstentions (Chad, Nigeria) that put the situation on the body’s agenda.

“Rarely has such an extensive charge-sheet of international crimes been brought to this Council’s attention,” Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights, Ivan Šimonović said, during the first meeting under the new agenda item that was decoupled with that concerning non-proliferation.  Today’s meeting also heard from Assistant Secretary-General for Political Affairs, Taye-Brook Zerihoun.

The meeting was requested in a letter sent to the Council President by 10 of its members (document S/2014/872) expressing concern about the “the scale and gravity of human rights violations” described in the report of the Commission of Inquiry established by the Human Rights Council (document S/2014/276) and its impact on international peace and security.

A resolution to submit the Commission report to the Security Council was adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December, following action by its Third Committee (Social, Humanitarian and Cultural).  The resolution encouraged the Council to consider referral of the situation to the International Criminal Court, as well as targeted sanctions against those who contributed to what the Commission had called “crimes against humanity”.

At this afternoon’s meeting, Mr. Šimonović said that the report described murder, extermination, disappearances, enslavement and rape, forced abortions and other sexual violence, with victims targeted on political, religious, racial and gender grounds.  “The report documents a totalitarian system that is characterized by brutally enforced denial of the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, as well as the rights to freedom, expression, information of association,” he stated.

Describing a loyalty rating system in the country, mass denial of food and other abuses contained in the report, he said that the Commission expressed its deepest horror at the country’s prison camp system, where, it estimated, hundreds of thousands had perished and some 100,000 were currently being held.

Noting that the Commission of Inquiry had highlighted the connections between the human rights situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and security in the region, he said the sustained military focus and nuclear priority of the Government had been pursued at the expense of the well-being of its people.  “If we are to reduce tension in the region, there must be movement towards real respect for human rights in the [Democratic People’s Republic of Korea].  This is deserving of the Security Council’s fullest attention and action.”

At the same time, he noted new signs of engagement between that country and international human rights mechanisms and bilateral negotiations with Japan on alleged abductions of Japanese nationals, which were an opportunity for real change.  The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) would support such progress, he pledged, urging that the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea be invited to visit without preconditions.

The Commission of Inquiry report, he said, would be followed up by a field-based structure in Seoul to serve as a hub for documentation, technical assistance and advocacy to advance accountability and improve human rights in that country.

The report had been presented to the Council in the context of international criminal law, he said, adding that the 15-member body could advance two crucial goals:  accountability and engagement for reform.  He encouraged it to “carefully monitor developments in the coming months to see whether engagement leads to real change, or should take further action”.

Assistant Secretary-General Zerihoun said that, aside from the Commission’s report, the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation had issued a report alleging that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was responsible for a recent cyber attack targeting Sony Pictures Entertainment.  While the United Nations was not privy to information on which the Bureau’s conclusions were based, the rise in the incidence and severity of cyber attacks was of increasing concern.

He concluded:  “It is not just the nuclear issue that deserves international attention and action,” and with that, he urged the Security Council to consider the wider implications of the reported grave human rights situation.

Agreeing that recent engagement offered an opportunity for redoubled efforts towards trust, dialogue and cooperation on all tracks, he said Member States should increase humanitarian assistance to the country.  He also encouraged a resumption of credible dialogue and meaningful engagement.  That would help overcome the standoff and go hand in hand with efforts to ensure accountability.

Before the procedural vote this afternoon, China’s representative, explaining why he and the Russian representative had objected to the agenda item, said that the Council was not the forum to take up human rights issues, which themselves should not be politicized.  Issues on the Korean peninsula were sensitive and the additional focus would hamper the Council’s efforts in peace and security there.

Also speaking before the vote was Australia’s representative, who said that the magnitude of the violations depicted a situation that threatened to destabilize the region.  That was why his country, along with 10 other Council members, had sent the letter to the Council president requesting that the situation be placed on the agenda, without prejudice to the item on non-proliferation.

Following the briefings, all Council members took the floor.  Some mentioned the cyber-attack issue, but most that had requested the meeting described horrors included in the report and urged the Council to refer the situation to the International Criminal Court and consider targeted sanctions.  They urged the body to stay seized of the issue and take action as appropriate.  Speakers described the report as heart-breaking and yearned for change.

Those speakers urged the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to take the opportunity to improve the situation themselves, but, like the representative of the United Kingdom, held that, if it failed to hold violators to account, the international community must be ready to do so.  Chad’s representative, in his national capacity, called for prudence before action was taken too hastily.  The Russian Federation’s representative stated that the Council must stop taking on issues outside its purview, of which this meeting was an example.

Also speaking today were the representatives of the United States, France, Nigeria, Luxembourg, Jordan, China, Chile, Rwanda, Lithuania, Argentina and Republic of Korea.

The meeting began at 3:08 p.m., was suspended at 3:15 p.m., resumed at 3:22 p.m. and ended at 5:10 p.m.

Statements

GARY QUINLAN (Australia) described the meeting as an historic step forward for the international community’s efforts to consider the situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and its broader implications.  It also sent a vital message to the people there that the world was aware of their suffering and stood in solidarity with them.  The Council recognized that the dangerous threat to international peace and security posed by that regime was not limited to its weapons programmes and proliferation, but also flowed from its atrocious treatment of its people.  Australia strongly disagreed with those who asserted that the Council had no business considering the issue.  Human rights violations of the type and scale being seen in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea had reverberations beyond that country and amounted to a rejection of global norms that underpinned stable societies and undermined peaceful inter-State relations.

With the Commission of Inquiry’s report, he said, the world now had a comprehensive, evidence-based assessment of the systematic, widespread and gross human rights violations being committed by that regime, which compelled a response.  By submitting the report to the Council for consideration and action, General Assembly members recognized that the Council had a responsibility to ensure accountability for the crimes being committed.  He urged countries having the most influence on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to press the case for fundamental change there.

SAMANTHA POWER (United States) said today’s meeting reflected a growing consensus that the widespread and systematic human rights violations committed by Democratic People’s Republic of Korea threated international peace and security.  The Commission had conducted more than 200 interviews and held public hearings in which more than 80 witnesses had given testimony.  It had found that systematic, widespread and gross human rights violations were being committed; the evidence had provided “reasonable grounds” that crimes against humanity had been committed, pursuant to State policies.  A former guard testified that the baby of a political prisoner had been cooked and fed to animals — abuse that fit a pattern of testimonies of sadistic acts.  An estimated 80,000 to 120,000 people were being held in prison camps where such crimes occurred.

She urged the Council to take up the issue because the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s response to the Commission’s report showed it was sensitive to criticism of its human rights record, threatening that efforts to hold it accountable would be met with “catastrophic” consequences.  If the Government wanted to be taken off the Council’s agenda, it should acknowledge its systematic violations, dismantle political prison camps, allow free, unfettered access of independent human rights observers and hold perpetrators accountable.  The Council must consider the recommendation that the situation be referred to the International Criminal Court.

FRANÇOIS DELATTRE (France) welcomed the Commission’s report, which documented cases in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea of murder, arbitrary detentions, torture, rape, forced disappearances, impeded humanitarian access and use of famine.  Hundreds of thousands of political prisoners had died in the camps through the years, and today, the Council had convened to hear the cries of those living under a blood-thirsty regime.  Its authorities should be held accountable for their crimes, as that was a moral obligation of the international community.  The Council should consider the Commission’s recommendation to refer the situation to the Criminal Court.  The regime’s violations threatened international peace and security, and destabilized the region.  The severity, scale and nature of the violations had revealed a “unique” State in terms of terror.  Nuclear blackmail could not dissuade the Council from considering the situation.  Pyongyang must take responsibility, release political prisoners and open itself to international media, non-governmental organizations and the United Nations.

USMAN SARKI (Nigeria), noting that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea had participated in the first and second cycles of the Universal Periodic Review, encouraged that Government to strengthen its engagement with the Human Rights Council and treaty bodies, with a view to promoting and protecting its citizens’ rights.

SYLVIE LUCAS (Luxembourg) said the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea had methodically flouted international law, and since 2006, conducted ballistic tests, regularly threatening nuclear strikes.  Just as serious, the country had repeatedly violated the most basic rights of its people, as documented in the “damning” Commission of Inquiry report on 7 January.  The text outlined crimes against humanity, which fell within the purview of the Rome Statute.  Respect for human rights was a hallmark of a stable society willing to live peacefully among its neighbours.  The Council should consider the Commission’s recommendation to refer the matter to the Court.  The Council also should consider taking targeted sanctions against those responsible for crimes against humanity.  She invited the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to authorize a visit of the Special Rapporteur and encouraged the Council to be regularly briefed on the situation there.

DINA KAWAR (Jordan) agreed that the report depicted a menace to international peace and security when combined with the country’s continued nuclear and ballistic missile activity.  The Council should make every effort to put an end to the abuses, as well as to the threat of use of nuclear weapons.  She called on the country to take prompt action to meet the concerns of the international community by inviting the Special Rapporteur and facilitating humanitarian aid.

MARK LYALL GRANT (United Kingdom) said the appalling contents of the report showed a paranoid, callous and dangerous regime, and a totalitarian State without parallel in the modern world.  The Council could not ignore such grave findings.   He welcomed signs that the international community was increasingly paying attention to the country.  “If the [Democratic People’s Republic of Korea] fails to hold violators to account, the international community must be ready to do so,” he stated.  He supported appropriate Council action to ensure accountability, including consideration of a referral to the International Criminal Court.  Countries untethered from the rule of law presented a threat to peace and security, he added.  The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea must address the situation and take the first positive moves to improve it.  The Council must remain seized of the matter.

LIU JIEYI (China) reiterated the position that China was against politicization of human rights issues, and that the Security Council was not the appropriate forum for their discussion.  As a neighbour of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, China was had great interest in reducing tensions in the Korean peninsula and was working for the denuclearization of the region, by, among other efforts, encouraging the return to six-party talks.

CRISTIÁN BARROS MELET (Chile) said that his country had signed onto the request for the meeting and believed it was timely and necessary.  The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea had dismissed the allegations of violations in the report, threatening at the same time to perform a new nuclear test.  A broader focus on the situation must be maintained with greater pressure brought to bear, not only on the nuclear issue, but on bringing an end to the impunity of those accountable.  He urged the country to allow a visit of the Special Rapporteur and called on the Council to remain seized of the matter.

OLIVIER NDUHUNGIREHE (Rwanda) said that, as a country that, in 1994, had suffered the worst human rights violations, it valued today’s meeting to examine such gross violations.  The three pillars of the responsibility to protect outlined the State’s primary duty to protect its people from the most serious abuses, with the international community obliged to use appropriate diplomatic, humanitarian and other means to do so.  If a State failed in its duty, the international community must be prepared to take action, in line with the Charter.  The Council should engage the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea on the basis of those pillars.  Rwanda was encouraged that that country had indicated a willingness to allow the Special Rapporteur’s access to its territory and hoped that would be pursued.  It was important for the Council to receive information from the Secretariat on the situation and its implications for international peace and security.  Rwanda supported the Commission’s recommendation to foster inter-Korean dialogue and urged all actors to engage in good faith to create favourable conditions for resuming political talks.  He hoped the Council would remain seized of the matter.

RAIMONDA MURMOKAITĖ (Lithuania) said that those responsible to protect the rights of North Koreans had ruthlessly enforced almost complete denial of their freedoms, with extermination, enslavement, torture, forced abortion and prolonged starvation.  Even as mass starvation was claiming thousands of lives, the State had given precedence to military spending.  There were indications that the Government was ready to engage in a human rights dialogue, but such signals needed to be followed by concrete action.  Lithuania welcomed the recent resolution of the General Assembly on the human rights situation in that country and encouraged the Council to follow suit and take appropriate action to ensure accountability, including through possible referral of the situation to the International Criminal Court, and consideration of the scope for effective targeted sanctions.  The crimes against humanity in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea would continue as long as the policies, institutions and patterns of impunity there remained in place.

MARÍA CRISTINA PERCEVAL (Argentina) said her Government had voted in favour of the resolutions of the Human Rights Council and Third Committee (Social, Humanitarian and Cultural), both of which condemned the gross, widespread and systematic human rights violations committed in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.  The inclusion of the issue on today’s agenda was outside the mandate of the Council, which would not contribute to the correct functioning of the United Nations system to extend its range of action beyond maintenance of international peace and security.  Today’s exception should not set a precedent.  She voiced concern over the Commission’s conclusion of widespread human rights violations, as well as the existence of crimes against humanity.  She also underscored the importance of diplomacy and political negotiations, with the goal of declaring the Korean peninsula free of nuclear weapons, adding that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea must protect and ensure the human rights of its people.

EVGENIY ZAGAYNOV (Russian Federation) said his Government was against the convening of today’s meeting, as it could lead to negative consequences for the effectiveness of the Council and other United Nations bodies.  Human rights issues should be considered in the Human Rights Council, which was created for that purpose.  Today’s discussion was unlikely to promote dialogue with the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea on the issue, for which the authorities had earlier stated they would be ready.

OH JOON (Republic of Korea) said that, despite international efforts to address human rights issues in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, the situation had continued to worsen, ultimately warranting the Council’s attention. This year’s Assembly resolution on the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was unique in that it contained a recommendation on the Council’s role in considering such matters.  The decision to place the situation on the Council’s agenda was a starting point for further discussion and engagement.  Human rights violations in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea were so systematic and widespread that they posed a threat to regional and international peace and security.

He urged the Council’s attention to the grave situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, citing the Commission’s finding that many of the violations amounted to crimes against humanity.  The Council must play a crucial role in ensuring accountability, including through referring the situation to the Court.  His Government took serious note of the United States’ statement that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was behind a cyber attack on Sony Pictures.  Addressing the human rights issue was essential for maintaining peace and stability on the peninsula and in the region.  He hoped Pyongyang would engage with the international community through human rights dialogue, including with the Special Rapporteur, and through technical cooperation with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).

MAHAMAT ZENE CHERIF (Chad), speaking in his national capacity, noted the massive violations alleged in the report and said the situation was indeed of deep concern if the veracity of the information was established.  At the same time, noting that the country had denied the report and that there had been little access by international observers, he urged prudence, pointing to errors that had been committed in the past due to taking hasty action on the basis of a report.  He called on the country’s representatives to clarify the situation and to allow access for that purpose, as well as to engage in dialogue.


Source:

http://www.unmultimedia.org/radio/library/2014/12/1271988.html

http://www.un.org/press/en/2014/sc11720.doc.htm

http://www.un.org/sg/offthecuff/index.asp?nid=3778

UN Security Council
7272nd Meeting
Summit: "Threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts: Foreign terrorist fighters"

 

24 September 2014

 

 

UN 안전보장이사회

제7272차 회의

정상회의: "테러행위에 의해 야기된 국제평화와 안보에 대한 위협: 외국인테러전투원"

 

2014. 9. 24.

 

 

(Part 1)

 

[Engish Interpretation/영어 통역]

http://webtv.un.org/meetings-events/security-council/watch/part-1-foreign-terrorist-fighters-threats-to-international-peace-and-security-caused-by-terrorist-acts-security-council-7272th-meeting/3806081079001

 

President Barack Obama is serving as the honorary President of the Security Council 7272th meeting due to the Presidency of the United States of America on the Security Council for the month of September.

 

[1:10:41 - 1:16:29]

Republic of Korea: Statement by H.E. PARK Geun-hye, President of the Republic of Korea (Original/Floor: English)

 

대한민국: 박근혜 대한민국 대통령 발언 (원음: 영어)

 

(Part 2)

 

[Engish Interpretation/영어 통역]

http://webtv.un.org/meetings-events/security-council/watch/part-2-foreign-terrorist-fighters-threats-to-international-peace-and-security-caused-by-terrorist-acts-security-council-7272th-meeting/3806468725001

 

 

[Excerpts/발췌]

http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/unifeed/2014/09/un-isil-1

 

The Security Council unanimously adopted a resolution that US President Barack Obama said  ”establishes new obligations that nations must meet.” He said the legally binding resolution  requires nations “to prevent and suppress the recruiting, organizing, transporting or equipping foreign terrorist fighters as well as the financing of their travel or activities."

 

[Excerpts/발췌]

http://webtv.un.org/meetings-events/security-council/watch/ban-ki-moon-foreign-terrorist-fighters-threats-to-international-peace-and-security-caused-by-terrorist-acts-security-council-7272th-meeting/3806685601001

 

Statement by UN Secretary-General BAN Ki-moon

 

반기문 UN 사무총장 연설

 

 

[Excerpts/발췌]

http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/unifeed/2014/09/un-isil-2

 

Abdullah II Bin Al Hussein, King of Jordan said "there has to be a zero tolerance policy to any country, organization, or individual that facilitates, supports or finances terror groups or provides weapons or promotes propaganda" adding that, "countries cannot comply in one theatre while making mischief in another." Speakers include: UK, Russia, Iraq, Turkey, Argentina, Kenya and US.

 

 

[Excerpts/발췌]

http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/unifeed/2014/09/un-isil-3

 

The UN Syrian Ambassador welcomed the formation of an international coalition “supported internationally, or through agreements or through bilateral cooperation” to fight terrorism in Syria and Iraq. Speaking to the Security Council, he said that his country “cannot conceive” a coalition that includes Qatar or Saudi Arabia, since these countries that are “the primary supporters of terrorism.”

 

 

[Excerpts/발췌]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bO-I-bufqzQ

 

Republic of Korea: Statement by H.E. PARK Geun-hye, President of the Republic of Korea (Original/Floor: English)

 

대한민국: 박근혜 대한민국 대통령 연설 (원음: 영어)


 

[Secretary-General BAN Ki-moon - Statement]

 

Secretary-General's remarks to Security Council High-Level Summit on Foreign Terrorist Fighters

New York, 24 September 2014

President Obama, thank you for your leadership in convening this Security Council Summit. This is the second time that you have presided over this Council on a matter with grave implications for international peace and security.

The world is witnessing a dramatic evolution in the nature of the terrorist threat.

In the last year, terrorist attacks have killed, maimed and displaced many thousands of civilians – the vast majority of them Muslims from Afghanistan to Somalia to Nigeria… from Iraq to Libya to Mali.

These attacks have been carried out by violent extremists who thrive in conditions of insecurity and injustice, fragility and failed leadership.

These groups ruthlessly hijack religion to control territory and vital economic resources. They brutalize women and girls. They target and slaughter minorities.

They are the enemies of faith.

As Muslim leaders around the world have said, groups like ISIL – or Da’ish -- have nothing to do with Islam, and they certainly do not represent a state.

They should more fittingly be called the “Un-Islamic Non-State”.

Yet these groups have become a magnet for foreign terrorist fighters who are easy prey to simplistic appeals and siren songs.

The UN’s Al Qaeda-Taliban Monitoring Team estimates that more than 13,000 foreign terrorist fighters from over 80 Member States have joined ISIL and the Al Nusra Front.

This growing phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters is a consequence -- not a cause -- of the conflict in Syria.
A long period of upheaval and, until recently, unresponsive leadership in Iraq – coupled with outrageous human rights abuses in Syria -- have created a hothouse of horrors.

There can be no genuine protection of civilians if extremist groups are permitted to act with impunity and the Syrian government continues its assault on its own people.

For more than a year, I have sounded the alarm about the vicious and unjustifiable actions of these groups and the danger they pose to Iraq, Syria, the wider region and international peace and security.

We need a creative and comprehensive political strategy in Syria and beyond to stem the flow of foreign terrorist fighters.

Terrorists must be defeated -- but we must do so in a way that avoids the deliberate acts of provocation that they set for us -- victimization, further radicalization and more civilian deaths.

Eliminating terrorism requires international solidarity and a multifaceted approach – among the many tools we must use, we must also tackle the underlying conditions that provide violent extremist groups the opportunity to take root.

Immediate security issues must be addressed.

Over the longer-term, the biggest threat to terrorists is not the power of missiles – it is the politics of inclusion.

It’s peaceful societies and respect for human rights. It’s education, jobs and real opportunity. It’s leaders who listen to their people and uphold the rule of law.

Missiles may kill terrorists. But good governance kills terrorism.

Free and independent societies – free from suffering, oppression and occupation – this is what will kill terrorism.

I welcome the Council resolution just adopted and its call for strengthening implementation of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy.

Through the UN Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force, we are stepping up efforts in support of Member States and regions seriously affected by terrorism.

Through the UN Counter-Terrorism Centre, we are working with Member States to enhance understanding of the foreign terrorist fighter phenomenon and to develop and implement policies to combat their flow.

Through our collective efforts, we must ensure that all counterterrorism actions and policies are consistent with international human rights and humanitarian laws.

As the custodian of the Charter of the United Nations, I want to emphasize that all measures must be fully in line with the goals and values and principles of the United Nations.

I once again welcome the new unity of purpose in the Council on this issue under the leadership of President Obama.

I hope that this spirit will carry over to other pressing issues, particularly finally bringing peace to the people of Syria.

Thank you, Mr. President.


[Chong Wa Dae - Briefing]

 

 

Remarks at the Security Council by H.E. Park Geun-hye President of the Republic of Korea

Mr. President,


We are here today to tap into our collective wisdom as we take on an emerging challenge to peace and security in our world.


ISIL and terrorist fighters from around the globe are endangering Iraq. This isn’t simply a threat to one country or one region. It affects us all.


Today`s meeting, coming as it does soon after President Obama’s ISIL strategy and the latest action, couldn’t have come at a better time.


9/11 brought the fight against terrorism to the top of the global agenda - a cause that this Council has been key to advancing.


For Koreans, ISIL’s brutal slaughter of innocent people is an appalling reminder of a similar fate that befell our own citizen 10 years ago. 


There can never be any excuse for trampling the norms of humanity, and the random killing of women and children.


They go against what Islam stands for, what civilization stands for, and what humanity stands for.


Foreign terrorist fighters serve as their minions. They slip across borders to spread terror. They are a scourge to mankínd.


Ladies and gentlemen,


Today’s milestone Resolution highlights the need for greater cooperation to better roll back this threat. These include information sharing, border control, tackling violent extremism and law enforcement.
 

Korea will implement it thoroughly. Those involved will be brought sternly to book and their funding blocked.


Nor can we neglect the more fundamental approach of dealing with the conditions that conduce to terrorism.


Getting rid of poverty and making development sustainable :
these are essential, if we are to address the root cause of terrorism.


Korea is a partner in this campaign. We are increasing our ODA to least developed countries. And we are giving humanitarian aid to countries threatened by ISIL and foreign fighters.


We must go further. We must remain ever vigilant against cyber and nuclear terrorism - and the utter chaos and destruction they could unleash.


All too often cyberspace is used to finance, recruit for, and incite radical violence.


We must prevent cyberspace from becoming not only the target of terror, but also a tool of terror.


Nuclear terrorism - however unthinkable - is also a possibility.
The post-9/11 world has already seen terrorist groups seeking nuclear materials. This is why international efforts to prevent nuclear-terrorism must be stepped up.


I wish to acknowledge in this regard, President Obama`s leadership in proposing a summit on nuclear security 5 years ago in this very chamber.


Today, the global regime for nuclear security is getting stronger, thanks to summit meetings in Washington, in Seoul, and in the Hague.


In the same vein, may this meeting today help rally our collective resolve. And may it kick-start concrete international actions against the new scourge of foreign fighters.


The fight against faceless, nameless terrorists without borders won’t be easy. But we also know that terrorizing human dignity and humanity is a strategy that is doomed to fail.


Seven decades ago, the founders of the UN, defeated the totalitarian threat and envisioned a world of peace - a world that puts humanity first.


This Council is a guardian of our rights and dignity as humans. It must meet head on the challenge of violent extremism and foreign fighters who spread it.


And in the effort to stem this threat, you will always find in Korea a committed partner.


Thank you. 


 

[청와대 뉴스]

 

박근혜 대통령 발언문:

유엔 안보리 정상회의 대통령 발언



의장님, 오늘 우리는 국제평화와 안보를 위협하는 새로운 도전에 대응하여 지혜를 모으고 공동대처 방안을 마련하기 위해 이 자리에 모였습니다. 


오늘날 이라크의 평화와 안전을 위협하는 ISIL과 전 세계로부터 모집된 FTF는 더 이상 한 국가나 지역만의 문제가 아니라 우리 모두의 문제, 국제사회 전체의 문제가 되었습니다. 


이와 관련, 오바마 대통령이 얼마 전에 ISIL 대응전략을 발표한데 이어, 오늘 FTF 문제에 대한 공동대처를 위해 안보리 정상회의를 개최한 것을 시의적절하고 의미있게 생각합니다. 


13년 전, 세계를 충격에 빠뜨린 9.11. 테러 이후 테러와의 전쟁은 국제사회의 최우선 과제가 되었고, 그 중심에 안보리가 있어 왔습니다. 

저는 ISIL이 폭력적 극단주의 하에 무고한 민간인들을 잔혹하게 살해하는 것을 목격하면서, 10년 전 유사 조직에 의해 잔인하게 희생된 우리 국민의 모습이 떠올랐습니다. 


인도주의에 관한 규범을 무시하고 어린이와 여성들 까지도 무차별적으로 살해하는 테러행위는 이슬람의 평화와 관용의 정신에도 배치되는 반문명적이고 반인륜적 행위로 어떠한 이유로도 용납될 수 없습니다. 


그러한 테러집단의 하수인으로서 국경을 은밀히 넘나들며 테러를 확산시키는 FTF의 반인륜적 활동은 인류에 대한 심각한 위협입니다. 


의장님, 각국 정상 및 대표 여러분, 오늘 채택된 결의 S-2014688호는 국제사회의 효과적 대응을 위해 정보공유와 국경통제, 폭력적 극단주의 대응, 그리고 법 집행을 위한 국가간 협력을 강조하고 있습니다. 


이번 결의가 FTF 문제 해결을 위한 이정표가 될 것으로 확신합니다. 대한민국은 특히, 엄격한 법집행과 효과적인 자금출처 차단 등을 통해 안보리 결의를 충실히 이행해 나갈 것입니다. 


이러한 조치와 병행하여 FTF를 배양하는 환경과 토양에 대한 보다 근본적인 대처도 필요합니다. 유엔 세계대테러전략(GCTS)이 제시하고 있듯이 테러의 근원적 해결을 위해서는 빈곤퇴치와 지속가능 개발 달성이 중요합니다. 


이를 위해 대한민국은 저개발국 대상 ODA 지원 확대와 ISIL과 FTF의 위협에 처한 국가들에 대한 인도지원을 통해, 유엔의 대테러 대처 노력에 동참하고 있습니다. 

더 나아가, 극단주의에 물든 FTF들이 사이버 및 핵 테러로 가공할 파괴와 혼란을 초래하지 않도록 우리 모두가 경계를 늦추지 말아야 할 것입니다. 


사이버 공간은 이미 테러자금 조달과 전투원 모집, 종교적 극단주의 선전에 사용되고 있습니다. 앞으로 사이버 공간이 테러의 표적이 되거나, SNS가 테러의 수단이 되는 것을 막아야 합니다. 


극단주의자들에 의해 자행될 수 있는 또 하나의 우려는 핵테러 가능성입니다. 9.11 이후 테러집단이 핵물질 획득을 추구해 온 것은 잘 알려져 있습니다. 

이러한 차원에서 핵테러 방지를 위한 국제사회의 노력도 강화되어야 할 것입니다. 


2009년 9월 바로 이 회의장에서 오바마 대통령이 핵테러 방지를 위한 핵안보정상회의를 제안한 것을 기억합니다. 

그 결과 지난 5년간 워싱턴, 서울, 헤이그 핵안보정상회의를 통해 국제 핵안보체제가 강화되고 있습니다. 


마찬가지로 이번 안보리 정상회의가 FTF 라고 하는 전대미문의 도전에 단호히 대응하는 국제사회의 정치적 의지를 결집하고 구체적으로 이행해 나가는 국제공조의 출발점이 되길 기대합니다. 


얼굴을 알 수 없고, 국경을 넘나들며 활동하는 익명의 FTF와의 싸움이 쉽지는 않을 것입니다. 그러나, 공포 전략(Strategy of Terror)을 앞세워 인간의 존엄성과 인도주의를 위협하는 어떠한 시도도 결코 성공할 수 없습니다. 


70년 전 유엔의 창설자들은 제2차 대전을 일으킨 전체주의와의 싸움을 이겨내고, 인권과 인도주의 가치 아래 사람이 중심이 되는 평화로운 세계를 구상하였습니다. 


안보리는 인권과 인도주의의 수호자로서 폭력적 극단주의와 FTF의 도전에 단호하게 대처해 나가야 합니다. 

대한민국은 이러한 반문명적 위협을 제거하려는 국제사회의 노력에 적극 동참할 것입니다. 감사합니다.


[Chong Wa Dae - Briefing]

 

The President Attends UN Security Council Summit

President Park Geun-hye attended the UN Security Council Summit in the afternoon. She is the first Korean head of state to take part in such a summit.


The summit was presided over by President Barack Obama of the United States, which is assuming the September presidency of the Security Council. The participating leaders discussed the issue of foreign terrorist fighters (FTF), who have emerged as severe threats to global peace and security. The summit began with a briefing on the current situation by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, which was followed by remarks by the heads of state and government of the Council’s member countries.


The UN Security Council Summit this time was attended by the heads of 13 countries, excepting China and Russia, which sent their foreign ministers.


President Park highlighted the fact that ISIL, which is at the center of chaotic disruption in Iraq and Syria, and foreign terrorist fighters, who have been mobilized from around the world, pose threats not only to a single country or region but also to the international community as a whole. She stressed the necessity for nations of the world to jointly take speedy, effective and thorough action to confront these threats.

 
The President underscored the fact that any attempts to threaten civilizations, human dignity and humanitarianism with a strategy of terror were doomed to fail. The President also emphatically said that the Korean Government would commit itself to international endeavors to tackle threats against humanity posed by foreign terrorist fighters by capitalizing on its experience in spearheading the efforts to adopt anti-terrorism resolutions as President of the 56th session of the UN General Assembly in 2001 in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

 
The President went on to stress that a fundamental approach had to be taken to deal with conditions conducive to spawning foreign terrorist fighters together with measures for strict law enforcement and effective blocking of funding sources. If we are to address the root cause of terrorism, the President said, it would be necessary to get rid of poverty, make development sustainable and establish effective governance.

 
On top of this, the President put emphasis on the need for the international community to remain ever vigilant against the use of cyberterrorism and nuclear weapons by extreme foreign terrorist fighters to prevent the utter chaos and destruction they could unleash.   


The Security Council adopted a resolution on measures to formulate a more effective international response to the threat of foreign terrorist fighters, including increased sharing of information, strengthened border controls, enhanced efforts to counter violent extremism, greater bilateral cooperation for effective law enforcement and stronger multilateral cooperation at the UN level.


The majority of the countries represented at the summit, including Korea, stressed the importance of preventing terrorist involvement by their own citizens, sharing information, strengthening domestic laws and regulations, and cooperating to prevent exploitation of information and communications technology for terrorist acts such as cyberterrorism. 


The Security Council is the UN organ with primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security. Alongside the 14 other leaders who attended the high-level summit, President Park proposed measures to address the issue of foreign terrorist fighters and demonstrated Korea’s commitment to actively partaking in the international efforts to combat this threat and to safeguard international peace and safety.


[청와대 뉴스]

 

대통령, 유엔 안보리 정상회의 참석

 



박근혜 대통령은 24일 오후 우리나라 정상으로는 처음으로 유엔 안전보장이사회(안보리) 정상회의에 참석했습니다. 

※ 우리나라는 현재 안보리 비상임이사국으로 활동 중(2013-14년 임기)

- 상임이사국 : 중국, 프랑스, 러시아, 영국, 미국

- 비상임이사국 : 우리나라, 요르단, 리투아니아, 룩셈부르크, 호주, 나이지리아, 르완다, 차드, 아르헨티나, 칠레


9월 안보리 의장국인 미국의 오바마 대통령 주재로 진행된 금일 안보리 정상회의에서는 최근 국제평화와 안전에 심각한 위협으로 부상한 외국인 테러전투원(FTF) 문제를 논의하였으며, 반기문 유엔 사무총장의 현황 설명에 이어 안보리 이사국 정상들의 발언이 있었습니다. 


금번 안보리 정상회의에는 13개 국가의 국가원수 또는 총리가 참석(중국과 러시아에서는 외교장관 참석)했습니다.

※ 의제 : 국제평화와 안전유지 - 외국인 테러전투원(Foreign Terrorist Fighters, FTF) 문제 대처

※ 외국인 테러전투원 : 해외 테러 집단의 활동에 자발적으로 참여하는 외국 국적을 가진 개인을 의미하며, 특히 시리아, 이라크 등을 중심으로 활동하는 ISIL(Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant)에는 총 1만 5천명의 FTF가 참여 중인 것으로 파악(NYT 기사(9.12))


박 대통령은 최근 이라크와 시리아에서 준동하고 있는 ISIL과 전 세계로부터 모집된 FTF는 더 이상 한 국가나 지역만의 문제가 아니라 국제사회 전체의 문제가 되었다는 점을 강조하고, FTF의 위협에 대해 신속하고, 효과적이며, 철저한 국제사회의 공동대응의 필요성을 강조했습니다.


공포 전략(Strategy of Terror)을 앞세워 문명과 인간의 존엄성 그리고 인도주의를 위협하는 어떠한 시도도 결코 성공할 수 없음을 강조하고 2001년 9·11 테러 당시 우리나라가 유엔총회 의장국으로서 대테러 결의채택을 주도한 경험을 살려 금번에도 반문명적인 FTF 위협에 대처하는 국제사회의 노력에 적극 동참 예정임을 강조했습니다.


박 대통령은 아울러 엄격한 법 집행과 효과적인 자금출처 차단 등의 조치와 함께 FTF를 배양하는 환경과 토양에 대한 보다 근본적인 대처가 필요하다고 강조하고 테러의 근원적 원인(root cause)을 해소하기 위해 빈곤퇴치, 지속 가능한 개발과 효율적인 거버넌스(governance) 구축 등의 과제를 제시했습니다.


아울러, 극단주의에 물든 FTF들이 사이버 및 핵 테러로 가공할 파괴와 혼란을 초래하지 못하도록 국제사회가 경계를 늦추지 말아야 할 필요성을 강조했습니다.


한편, 금번 안보리 정상회의에서는 FTF 위협에 대한 국제사회의 효과적 대응을 위해 △ 정보공유와 국경통제, △ 폭력적 극단주의 대응, △ 효율적 법 집행을 위한 국가간 협력 강화, △ 유엔 차원에서의 다자적 노력 강화 등을 내용으로 하는 결의안이 채택되었습니다. 


우리나라 포함, 안보리 이사국 대다수가 △ 자국민의 테러전투원 참여 방지 △ 회원국간 관련정보 공유, △ 국내사법체제 강화 △ FTF의 정보통신기술 악용(사이버 테러 등)에 대한 효과적 대처 필요성을 강조했습니다.


박 대통령이 국제평화와 안전문제에 대한 1차적 책임을 갖고 있는 안보리 정상회의에 여타 14개국 정상급 인사들과 나란히 참석하여 FTF 문제에 대한 해결방안을 제시하고, 국제사회의 노력에 적극 동참해 나갈 의사를 표명함으로써 국제사회내 평화안전에 기여하는 나라로서의 대한민국의 위상을 크게 높이는 계기가 된 것으로 평가됩니다.


[UN News]

Security Council high-level summit tackles growing threat of foreign terrorist fighters

 

안보리 정상급회의, 점증하는 외국인테러전투원에 대처

 

Wide view of the Security Council at its summit held at the level of Heads of Government to address the threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters. UN Photo/Mark Garten

 

24 September 2014 – Responding to an unprecedented flow of foreign terrorist fighters and the growth of facilitation networks fuelling conflicts around the world, the United Nations Security Council today adopted a resolution to resolutely address this growing threat to international peace and security.

During a high-level summit chaired by Barack Obama, President of the United States, which holds the Council’s rotating presidency this month, the 15-member body voted unanimously to adopt the text, which calls on Member States to cooperate in efforts to address the threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters.

The resolution decided that Member States shall “prevent and suppress the recruiting, organizing, transporting or equipping of individuals who travel to a State other than their State of residence or nationality for the purpose of the perpetration, planning or preparation of, or participation in, terrorist acts or the providing or receiving of terrorist training, and the financing of their travel and of their activities…”

It underscored “the particular and urgent need to implement this resolution with respect to those foreign terrorist fighters who are associated with ISIL [Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant], ANF [Al-Nusrah Front] and other cells, affiliates, splinter groups or derivatives of Al-Qaida…”

Among its other provisions, the text urged Member States to intensify and accelerate the exchange of operational information regarding actions or movements of terrorists or terrorist networks, including foreign terrorist fighters.

Opening the meeting, which was scheduled to hear from around 50 speakers, many of them represented at the level of head of State or government, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called those who carry out terrorist attacks “enemies of the faith.”

“As Muslim leaders around the world have said, groups like ISIL – or Da’ish – have nothing to do with Islam, and they certainly do not represent a state,” he stated. “They should more fittingly be called the ‘Un-Islamic Non-State.’”

He added that the growing phenomenon of foreign terrorist fighters is a consequence – not a cause – of the conflict in Syria.

“A long period of upheaval and, until recently, unresponsive leadership in Iraq – coupled with outrageous human rights abuses in Syria – have created a hothouse of horrors,” he said, as he highlighted the need for a “creative and comprehensive” political strategy in Syria and beyond to stem the flow of foreign terrorist fighters.

“Terrorists must be defeated, but we must do so in a way that avoids the deliberate acts of provocation that they set for us – victimization, further radicalization and more civilian deaths.”

While immediate security issues must be addressed, said the Secretary-General, the biggest threat to terrorists over the longer term is not the power of missiles, but the politics of inclusion.

“It’s peaceful societies and respect for human rights. It’s education, jobs and real opportunity. It’s leaders who listen to their people and uphold the rule of law. Missiles may kill terrorists. But good governance kills terrorism. Free and independent societies – free from suffering, oppression and occupation – this is what will kill terrorism.”

Speaking in his national capacity, Mr. Obama said that the tactic of terrorism is not new. “So many nations represented here today, including my own, have seen our citizens killed by terrorists who target innocents,” he said, while also noting the murder today of French citizen Hervé Gourdel by terrorists in Algeria.

“Resolutions alone will not be enough,” he added. “Promises on paper cannot keep us safe. Lofty rhetoric and good intentions will not stop a single terrorist attack.

“The words spoken here today must be matched and translated into action, into deeds – concrete action, within nations and between them, not just in the days ahead, but for years to come. For if there was ever a challenge in our interconnected world that cannot be met by any one nation alone, it is this: terrorists crossing borders and threatening to unleash unspeakable violence.

“These terrorists believe our countries will be unable to stop them. The safety of our citizens demands that we do.”

In a statement issued to the press, the Council strongly condemned the “heinous and cowardly murder” Mr. Gourdel, saying the killing once again demonstrates the barbaric brutality of those who declare themselves affiliated to ISIL.

Council members stressed that those responsible for the killing must be held accountable, and demanded the immediate, safe and unconditional release of all those who are kept hostage by ISIL, Al-Nusrah Front and all other individuals, groups, undertakings and entities associated with Al-Qaida.


 

 

United Nations

 

S/RES/2178 (2014)

 

 

Security Council

 

Distr.: General

24 September 2014

 

 

 


 

                  Resolution 2178 (2014)

 

 

                     Adopted by the Security Council at its 7272nd meeting, on 24 September 2014

 

 

          The Security Council,

          Reaffirming that terrorism in all forms and manifestations constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security and that any acts of terrorism are criminal and unjustifiable regardless of their motivations, whenever and by whomsoever committed, and remaining determined to contribute further to enhancing the effectiveness of the overall effort to fight this scourge on a global level,

          Noting with concern that the terrorism threat has become more diffuse, with an increase, in various regions of the world, of terrorist acts including those motivated by intolerance or extremism, and expressing its determination to combat this threat,

          Bearing in mind the need to address the conditions conducive to the spread of terrorism, and affirming Member States’ determination to continue to do all they can to resolve conflict and to deny terrorist groups the ability to put down roots and establish safe havens to address better the growing threat posed by terrorism,

          Emphasizing that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality or civilization,

          Recognizing that international cooperation and any measures taken by Member States to prevent and combat terrorism must comply fully with the Charter of the United Nations,

          Reaffirming its respect for the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of all States in accordance with the Charter,

          Reaffirming that Member States must ensure that any measures taken to counter terrorism comply with all their obligations under international law, in particular international human rights law, international refugee law, and international humanitarian law, underscoring that respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms and the rule of law are complementary and mutually reinforcing with effective counter-terrorism measures, and are an essential part of a successful counter-terrorism effort and notes the importance of respect for the rule of law so as to effectively prevent and combat terrorism, and noting that failure to comply with these and other international obligations, including under the Charter of the United Nations, is one of the factors contributing to increased radicalization and fosters a sense of impunity,

          Expressing grave concern over the acute and growing threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters, namely individuals who travel to a State other than their States of residence or nationality for the purpose of the perpetration, planning, or preparation of, or participation in, terrorist acts or the providing or receiving of terrorist training, including in connection with armed conflict, and resolving to address this threat,

          Expressing grave concern about those who attempt to travel to become foreign terrorist fighters,

          Concerned that foreign terrorist fighters increase the intensity, duration and intractability of conflicts, and also may pose a serious threat to their States of origin, the States they transit and the States to which they travel, as well as States neighbouring zones of armed conflict in which foreign terrorist fighters are active and that are affected by serious security burdens, and noting that the threat of foreign terrorist fighters may affect all regions and Member States, even those far from conflict zones, and expressing grave concern that foreign terrorist fighters are using their extremist ideology to promote terrorism,

          Expressing concern that international networks have been established by terrorists and terrorist entities among States of origin, transit and destination through which foreign terrorist fighters and the resources to support them have been channelled back and forth,

          Expressing particular concern that foreign terrorist fighters are being recruited by and are joining entities such as the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), the Al-Nusrah Front (ANF) and other cells, affiliates, splinter groups or derivatives of Al-Qaida, as designated by the Committee established pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999) and 1989 (2011), recognizing that the foreign terrorist fighter threat includes, among others, individuals supporting acts or activities of Al-Qaida and its cells, affiliates, splinter groups, and derivative entities, including by recruiting for or otherwise supporting acts or activities of such entities, and stressing the urgent need to address this particular threat,

          Recognizing that addressing the threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters requires comprehensively addressing underlying factors, including by preventing radicalization to terrorism, stemming recruitment, inhibiting foreign terrorist fighter travel, disrupting financial support to foreign terrorist fighters, countering violent extremism, which can be conducive to terrorism, countering incitement to terrorist acts motivated by extremism or intolerance, promoting political and religious tolerance, economic development and social cohesion and inclusiveness, ending and resolving armed conflicts, and facilitating reintegration and rehabilitation,

          Recognizing also that terrorism will not be defeated by military force, law enforcement measures, and intelligence operations alone, and underlining the need to address the conditions conducive to the spread of terrorism, as outlined in Pillar I of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy (A/RES/60/288),

          Expressing concern over the increased use by terrorists and their supporters of communications technology for the purpose of radicalizing to terrorism, recruiting and inciting others to commit terrorist acts, including through the internet, and financing and facilitating the travel and subsequent activities of foreign terrorist fighters, and underlining the need for Member States to act cooperatively to prevent terrorists from exploiting technology, communications and resources to incite support for terrorist acts, while respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms and in compliance with other obligations under international law,

          Noting with appreciation the activities undertaken in the area of capacity building by United Nations entities, in particular entities of the Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force (CTITF), including the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the United Nations Centre for Counter-Terrorism (UNCCT), and also the efforts of the Counter Terrorism Committee Executive Directorate (CTED) to facilitate technical assistance, specifically by promoting engagement between providers of capacity-building assistance and recipients, in coordination with other relevant international, regional and subregional organizations, to assist Member States, upon their request, in implementation of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy,

          Noting recent developments and initiatives at the international, regional and subregional levels to prevent and suppress international terrorism, and noting the work of the Global Counterterrorism Forum (GCTF), in particular its recent adoption of a comprehensive set of good practices to address the foreign terrorist fighter phenomenon, and its publication of several other framework documents and good practices, including in the areas of countering violent extremism, criminal justice, prisons, kidnapping for ransom, providing support to victims of terrorism, and community-oriented policing, to assist interested States with the practical implementation of the United Nations counter-terrorism legal and policy framework and to complement the work of the relevant United Nations counter-terrorism entities in these areas,

          Noting with appreciation the efforts of INTERPOL to address the threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters, including through global law enforcement information sharing enabled by the use of its secure communications network, databases, and system of advisory notices, procedures to track stolen, forged identity papers and travel documents, and INTERPOL’s counter-terrorism fora and foreign terrorist fighter programme,

          Having regard to and highlighting the situation of individuals of more than one nationality who travel to their states of nationality for the purpose of the perpetration, planning, preparation of, or participation in, terrorist acts or the providing or receiving of terrorist training, and urging States to take action, as appropriate, in compliance with their obligations under their domestic law and international law, including international human rights law,

          Calling upon States to ensure, in conformity with international law, in particular international human rights law and international refugee law, that refugee status is not abused by the perpetrators, organizers or facilitators of terrorist acts, including by foreign terrorist fighters,

          Reaffirming its call upon all States to become party to the international counter-terrorism conventions and protocols as soon as possible, whether or not they are a party to regional conventions on the matter, and to fully implement their obligations under those to which they are a party,

          Noting the continued threat to international peace and security posed by terrorism, and affirming the need to combat by all means, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts, including those perpetrated by foreign terrorist fighters,

          Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,

          1.       Condemns the violent extremism, which can be conducive to terrorism, sectarian violence, and the commission of terrorist acts by foreign terrorist fighters, and demands that all foreign terrorist fighters disarm and cease all terrorist acts and participation in armed conflict;

          2.       Reaffirms that all States shall prevent the movement of terrorists or terrorist groups by effective border controls and controls on issuance of identity papers and travel documents, and through measures for preventing counterfeiting, forgery or fraudulent use of identity papers and travel documents, underscores, in this regard, the importance of addressing, in accordance with their relevant international obligations, the threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters, and encourages Member States to employ evidence-based traveller risk assessment and screening procedures including collection and analysis of travel data, without resorting to profiling based on stereotypes founded on grounds of discrimination prohibited by international law;

          3.       Urges Member States, in accordance with domestic and international law, to intensify and accelerate the exchange of operational information regarding actions or movements of terrorists or terrorist networks, including foreign terrorist fighters, especially with their States of residence or nationality, through bilateral or multilateral mechanisms, in particular the United Nations;

          4.       Calls upon all Member States, in accordance with their obligations under international law, to cooperate in efforts to address the threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters, including by preventing the radicalization to terrorism and recruitment of foreign terrorist fighters, including children, preventing foreign terrorist fighters from crossing their borders, disrupting and preventing financial support to foreign terrorist fighters, and developing and implementing prosecution, rehabilitation and reintegration strategies for returning foreign terrorist fighters;

          5.       Decides that Member States shall, consistent with international human rights law, international refugee law, and international humanitarian law, prevent and suppress the recruiting, organizing, transporting or equipping of individuals who travel to a State other than their States of residence or nationality for the purpose of the perpetration, planning, or preparation of, or participation in, terrorist acts or the providing or receiving of terrorist training, and the financing of their travel and of their activities;

          6.       Recalls its decision, in resolution 1373 (2001), that all Member States shall ensure that any person who participates in the financing, planning, preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or in supporting terrorist acts is brought to justice, and decides that all States shall ensure that their domestic laws and regulations establish serious criminal offenses sufficient to provide the ability to prosecute and to penalize in a manner duly reflecting the seriousness of the offense:

          (a)     their nationals who travel or attempt to travel to a State other than their States of residence or nationality, and other individuals who travel or attempt to travel from their territories to a State other than their States of residence or nationality, for the purpose of the perpetration, planning, or preparation of, or participation in, terrorist acts, or the providing or receiving of terrorist training;

          (b)     the wilful provision or collection, by any means, directly or indirectly, of funds by their nationals or in their territories with the intention that the funds should be used, or in the knowledge that they are to be used, in order to finance the travel of individuals who travel to a State other than their States of residence or nationality for the purpose of the perpetration, planning, or preparation of, or participation in, terrorist acts or the providing or receiving of terrorist training; and,

          (c)     the wilful organization, or other facilitation, including acts of recruitment, by their nationals or in their territories, of the travel of individuals who travel to a State other than their States of residence or nationality for the purpose of the perpetration, planning, or preparation of, or participation in, terrorist acts or the providing or receiving of terrorist training;

          7.       Expresses its strong determination to consider listing pursuant to resolution 2161 (2014) individuals, groups, undertakings and entities associated with Al-Qaida who are financing, arming, planning, or recruiting for them, or otherwise supporting their acts or activities, including through information and communications technologies, such as the internet, social media, or any other means;

          8.       Decides that, without prejudice to entry or transit necessary in the furtherance of a judicial process, including in furtherance of such a process related to arrest or detention of a foreign terrorist fighter, Member States shall prevent the entry into or transit through their territories of any individual about whom that State has credible information that provides reasonable grounds to believe that he or she is seeking entry into or transit through their territory for the purpose of participating in the acts described in paragraph 6, including any acts or activities indicating that an individual, group, undertaking or entity is associated with Al-Qaida, as set out in paragraph 2 of resolution 2161 (2014), provided that nothing in this paragraph shall oblige any State to deny entry or require the departure from its territories of its own nationals or permanent residents;

          9.       Calls upon Member States to require that airlines operating in their territories provide advance passenger information to the appropriate national authorities in order to detect the departure from their territories, or attempted entry into or transit through their territories, by means of civil aircraft, of individuals designated by the Committee established pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999) and 1989 (2011) (“the Committee”), and further calls upon Member States to report any such departure from their territories, or such attempted entry into or transit through their territories, of such individuals to the Committee, as well as sharing this information with the State of residence or nationality, as appropriate and in accordance with domestic law and international obligations;

          10.     Stresses the urgent need to implement fully and immediately this resolution with respect to foreign terrorist fighters, underscores the particular and urgent need to implement this resolution with respect to those foreign terrorist fighters who are associated with ISIL, ANF and other cells, affiliates, splinter groups or derivatives of Al-Qaida, as designated by the Committee, and expresses its readiness to consider designating, under resolution 2161 (2014), individuals associated with Al-Qaida who commit the acts specified in paragraph 6 above;

 

                           International Cooperation

 

          11.     Calls upon Member States to improve international, regional, and subregional cooperation, if appropriate through bilateral agreements, to prevent the travel of foreign terrorist fighters from or through their territories, including through increased sharing of information for the purpose of identifying foreign terrorist fighters, the sharing and adoption of best practices, and improved understanding of the patterns of travel by foreign terrorist fighters, and for Member States to act cooperatively when taking national measures to prevent terrorists from exploiting technology, communications and resources to incite support for terrorist acts, while respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms and in compliance with other obligations under international law;

          12.     Recalls its decision in resolution 1373 (2001) that Member States shall afford one another the greatest measure of assistance in connection with criminal investigations or proceedings relating to the financing or support of terrorist acts, including assistance in obtaining evidence in their possession necessary for the proceedings, and underlines the importance of fulfilling this obligation with respect to such investigations or proceedings involving foreign terrorist fighters;

          13.     Encourages Interpol to intensify its efforts with respect to the foreign terrorist fighter threat and to recommend or put in place additional resources to support and encourage national, regional and international measures to monitor and prevent the transit of foreign terrorist fighters, such as expanding the use of INTERPOL Special Notices to include foreign terrorist fighters;

          14.     Calls upon States to help build the capacity of States to address the threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters, including to prevent and interdict foreign terrorist fighter travel across land and maritime borders, in particular the States neighbouring zones of armed conflict where there are foreign terrorist fighters, and welcomes and encourages bilateral assistance by Member States to help build such national capacity;

 

                           Countering Violent Extremism in Order to Prevent Terrorism

 

          15.     Underscores that countering violent extremism, which can be conducive to terrorism, including preventing radicalization, recruitment, and mobilization of individuals into terrorist groups and becoming foreign terrorist fighters is an essential element of addressing the threat to international peace and security posed by foreign terrorist fighters, and calls upon Member States to enhance efforts to counter this kind of violent extremism;

          16.     Encourages Member States to engage relevant local communities and non-governmental actors in developing strategies to counter the violent extremist narrative that can incite terrorist acts, address the conditions conducive to the spread of violent extremism, which can be conducive to terrorism, including by empowering youth, families, women, religious, cultural and education leaders, and all other concerned groups of civil society and adopt tailored approaches to countering recruitment to this kind of violent extremism and promoting social inclusion and cohesion;

          17.     Recalls its decision in paragraph 14 of resolution 2161 (2014) with respect to improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and individuals, groups, undertakings and entities associated with Al-Qaida, and urges Member States, in this context, to act cooperatively when taking national measures to prevent terrorists from exploiting technology, communications and resources, including audio and video, to incite support for terrorist acts, while respecting human rights and fundamental freedoms and in compliance with other obligations under international law;

          18.     Calls upon Member States to cooperate and consistently support each other’s efforts to counter violent extremism, which can be conducive to terrorism, including through capacity building, coordination of plans and efforts, and sharing lessons learned;

          19.     Emphasizes in this regard the importance of Member States’ efforts to develop non-violent alternative avenues for conflict prevention and resolution by affected individuals and local communities to decrease the risk of radicalization to terrorism, and of efforts to promote peaceful alternatives to violent narratives espoused by foreign terrorist fighters, and underscores the role education can play in countering terrorist narratives;

 

                           United Nations Engagement on the Foreign Terrorist Fighter Threat

 

          20.     Notes that foreign terrorist fighters and those who finance or otherwise facilitate their travel and subsequent activities may be eligible for inclusion on the Al-Qaida Sanctions List maintained by the Committee pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999) and 1989 (2011) where they participate in the financing, planning, facilitating, preparing, or perpetrating of acts or activities by, in conjunction with, under the name of, on behalf of, or in support of, Al-Qaida, supplying, selling or transferring arms and related materiel to, or recruiting for, or otherwise supporting acts or activities of Al-Qaida or any cell, affiliate, splinter group or derivative thereof, and calls upon States to propose such foreign terrorist fighters and those who facilitate or finance their travel and subsequent activities for possible designation;

          21.     Directs the Committee established pursuant to resolution 1267 (1999) and 1989 (2011) and the Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team, in close cooperation with all relevant United Nations counter-terrorism bodies, in particular CTED, to devote special focus to the threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters recruited by or joining ISIL, ANF and all groups, undertakings and entities associated with Al-Qaida;

          22.     Encourages the Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team to coordinate its efforts to monitor and respond to the threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters with other United Nations counter-terrorism bodies, in particular the CTITF;

          23.     Requests the Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team, in close cooperation with other United Nations counter-terrorism bodies, to report to the Committee established pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999) and 1989 (2011) within 180 days, and provide a preliminary oral update to the Committee within 60 days, on the threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters recruited by or joining ISIL, ANF and all groups, undertakings and entities associated with Al-Qaida, including:

          (a)     a comprehensive assessment of the threat posed by these foreign terrorist fighters, including their facilitators, the most affected regions and trends in radicalization to terrorism, facilitation, recruitment, demographics, and financing; and

          (b)     recommendations for actions that can be taken to enhance the response to the threat posed by these foreign terrorist fighters;

          24.     Requests the Counter-Terrorism Committee, within its existing mandate and with the support of CTED, to identify principal gaps in Member States’ capacities to implement Security Council resolutions 1373 (2001) and 1624 (2005) that may hinder States’ abilities to stem the flow of foreign terrorist fighters, as well as to identify good practices to stem the flow of foreign terrorist fighters in the implementation of resolutions 1373 (2001) and 1624 (2005), and to facilitate technical assistance, specifically by promoting engagement between providers of capacity-building assistance and recipients, especially those in the most affected regions, including through the development, upon their request, of comprehensive counter-terrorism strategies that encompass countering violent radicalization and the flow of foreign terrorist fighters, recalling the roles of other relevant actors, for example the Global Counterterrorism Forum;

          25.     Underlines that the increasing threat posed by foreign terrorist fighters is part of the emerging issues, trends and developments related to resolutions 1373 (2001) and 1624 (2005), that, in paragraph 5 of resolution 2129 (2013), the Security Council directed CTED to identify, and therefore merits close attention by the Counter-Terrorism Committee, consistent with its mandate;

          26.     Requests the Committee established pursuant to resolutions 1267 (1999) and 1989 (2011) and the Counter-Terrorism Committee to update the Security Council on their respective efforts pursuant to this resolution;

          27.     Decides to remain seized of the matter.


 [Start1]<<ODS JOB NO>>N1454798E<<ODS JOB NO>>

<<ODS DOC SYMBOL1>>S/RES/2178 (2014)<<ODS DOC SYMBOL1>>

<<ODS DOC SYMBOL2>><<ODS DOC SYMBOL2>>


Source:

http://www.un.org/sg/STATEMENTS/index.asp?nid=8040

http://english1.president.go.kr/activity/briefing.php?srh%5Bboard_no%5D=21&srh%5Bpage%5D=8&srh%5Bview_mode%5D=detail&srh%5Bseq%5D=7503&srh%5Bdetail_no%5D=218#sthash.fXqIWbR1.dpuf

http://english1.president.go.kr/activity/briefing.php?srh%5Bboard_no%5D=21&srh%5Bpage%5D=8&srh%5Bview_mode%5D=detail&srh%5Bseq%5D=7511&srh%5Bdetail_no%5D=217#sthash.g3tgg51e.dpuf

http://www1.president.go.kr/news/newsList.php?srh%5Byear%5D=2014&srh%5Bmonth%5D=9&srh%5Bview_mode%5D=detail&srh%5Bseq%5D=7515

http://www1.president.go.kr/news/newsList.php?srh%5Byear%5D=2014&srh%5Bmonth%5D=9&srh%5Bview_mode%5D=detail&srh%5Bseq%5D=7457

http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=48824#.VQbdT5B01Ic

http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/2178 (2014)

UN Secretary-General BAN Ki-moon's comments/position on the execution of the death penalty against the former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein

 

반기문 신임 UN 사무총장의 사담 후세인 이라크 전직 대통령 사형집행에 관한 발언/입장


Media Stakeout

 

2 January 2007

 

 

반기문 UN 사무총장 기자회견

 

2007. 1. 2.

 

02 January 07 Media Stakeout: Informal comments to the Media by the Secretary-General, Ban Ki-moon, on the situation in Sudan and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and other matters.
[Webcast: Archived Video - 12 minutes ]

 

[5:33 - 6:39]


 

[Meetings Coverage and Press Releases/회의취재 및 보도자료]

Off-the-Cuff

Secretary-General's encounter with the UN press corps

New York, 2 January 2007

 

 

반기문 UN 사무총장의 UN 기자단과의 기자회견

 

New York

2007. 1. 2.

 

(...)

 

Q: Should Saddam Hussein have been executed, Mr. Secretary-General?

 

SG: Saddam Hussein was responsible for committing heinous crimes and unspeakable atrocities against the Iraqi people. We should never forget the victims of his crimes. The issue of capital punishment is for each and every Member State to decide. As a Secretary-General, at the same time, while I am firmly against impunity, I also hope that the members of the international community should pay due regard to all aspects of international humanitarian laws. During my entire tenure, I will try my best to help Member States, the international community, to strengthen the rule of law.

 

(...)


[UN News]

Ban Ki-moon takes over as UN Secretary-General, calls for common action to face crises

 

UN 사무총장직을 이어받은 반기문, 위기에 맞서기 위하여 공동행동 촉구

 

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon

2 January 2007 – Passing an honour guard and welcomed with applause from staff, former Republic of Korea Foreign Minister Ban Ki-moon took over formally as United Nations Secretary-General today with a call for collective action to address a host of international crises from Sudan’s Darfur conflict to the nuclear programmes of Iran and North Korea.

Mr. Ban, who succeeded Kofi Annan to become the eighth UN Secretary-General as the New Year came in on 1 January, smiled broadly as he entered the towering landmark building housing UN Headquarters on New York’s East River, where he paid tribute at the memorial for UN personnel who have fallen in the line of duty.

“I am very much overwhelmed by all this warm welcome,” he told a crowd of reporters. “Your presence this morning is a vivid proof that the United Nations is much alive in the front line addressing all the challenges and issues and trying to give hope to all the people around the world,” he said.

“I start my day as Secretary-General of the United Nations with much expectations and hope and promise and I need your strong support. I start my duty at a daunting time in international affairs starting from Darfur to Middle East, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, many other crises that trouble our world,” he added, stressing that these issues need to be addressed collectively.

Answering questions, Mr. Ban said he would immediately turn his attention to the issue of Darfur more than three years of fighting between Sudanese Government forces, allied militias and rebel groups seeking greater autonomy have left more than 200,000 people dead and driven more than 2.5 million from their homes.

Asked about North Korea’s nuclear weapons programme, he said that in his former position he had been deeply involved personally and as Secretary-General he will first try to facilitate the smooth progress of the six-party talks between the two Koreas, China, Japan, Russia and the United States seeking a solution.

Asked about the hanging of former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, Mr. Ban said the issue of the death penalty was a question for each country to decide.

“Saddam Hussein was responsible for committing heinous crimes and unspeakable atrocities against the Iraqi people,” he noted. “We should never forget the victims of his crimes. The issue of capital punishment is for each and every Member State to decide.

“As a Secretary-General, at the same time, while I am firmly against impunity, I also hope that the members of the international community should pay due regard to all aspects of international humanitarian laws. During my entire tenure, I will try my best to help Member States, the international community, to strengthen the rule of law.”


Daily Noon Press Briefing

 

2 January 2007

 

대변인 일일 정오 브리핑

 

2007. 1. 2.

 

02 January 07

Daily Noon Press Briefing: By the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.
[Webcast: Archived Video - 30 minutes ]

 

[2:32 - 3:25]
[7:27 - 10:32]
[15:45 - 16:46]

[24:22 - 24:59]

[26:51 - 27:48]


 

 

2 January 2007

DAILY PRESS BRIEFING BY THE OFFICE OF THE SPOKESPERSON FOR THE SECRETARY-GENERAL

 

2007. 1. 2.

UN 사무총장 대변인실 일일 브리핑

Noon Briefings

 

(...)

 

Turning now to Iraq, the Secretary-General was asked about the death sentence imposed over the weekend against Saddam Hussein and he said that we should never forget the victims of Saddam Hussein’s crimes.  The Secretary-General said that it is up to each Member State to decide on the issue of capital punishment, but he added that all States should pay due respect to international humanitarian law.

The Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Iraq, Ashraf Qazi, issued a statement over the weekend on the imposition of the death sentence against Saddam Hussein, saying that the United Nations stands firmly against impunity, and understands the desire for justice felt by many Iraqis.  However, Qazi added, the United Nations remains opposed to capital punishment, even in the case of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

 

(...)

 

Question:  Congratulations.  I was just hoping you could square the statement by Mr. Qazi that the United Nations remains opposed to capital punishment.  The Secretary-General did not sound like he was fundamentally opposed to capital punishment, that it was up to Member States to decide, and also -- if you could point to –- within international humanitarian law, whether there are specific prohibitions, conditions on the death penalty that he may have been sort of tacitly referring to in his statement.

 

Spokesperson:  Yes, I think that what he was tacitly referring to is that there have been several statements made about the fact that the UN and its Human Rights Council do not recognize the death penalty.  And what he said today is a nuance on the situation, stating that we should think first about the victims and the need for justice -– and he did mention that it is up to each country to decide, and he talked about respect for humanitarian law.

 

Question:  Is he opposed to the death penalty?
 

Spokesperson:  He just wanted to leave it open to Member States.

 

Question:  But does this actually reflect a change in the UN policy on the death penalty, because before, every time the death penalty was mentioned, UN officials were opposed to it.  Mr. Ban was questioned twice on this and specifically did not say that.  So does this reflect a change in the UN policy?

 

Spokesperson:  No, it does not.  The UN policy still remains that the Organization is not for capital punishment.  However, the way the law is applied in different countries, he left it open to those different countries.

 

Question:  While commenting on Saddam Hussein and capital punishment, the Secretary-General made no reference to the trial that took place, because UN experts, including the former Secretary-General, had said that the trial was not credible.  So where does Mr. Ban Ki-moon stand on that trial?
 

Spokesperson:  On the trial, he has not commented on it yet, but if you want to have his comments on the trial, I will request some comments. 

 

Question:  And to follow up on that.  Also, Iraq is occupied and there is a fight against that occupation, and there are rules and laws governing what kinds of trials get held about the people who get captured by the occupiers.  And so I would appreciate a response, because it was not just some country that imposed a death penalty, but it was an occupied country.

 

Spokesperson:  You want his take on the trial itself…  Yes.

 

Question:  Many people are feeling that it is a war crime to have done this execution.

 

Spokesperson:  I will definitely get back to you on this.

 

(...)

 

Question:  (...) And also, can we go back to the death penalty?  I am a bit confused.  If the Secretary-General thinks that the position of the UN remains unchanged on this, why did he not restate that the UN is opposed to the death penalty, just like Mr. Qazi did?
 

Spokesperson:  Oh, I think essentially, because his national position is that there are some countries that do recognize the death penalty, and, from what I gather, he would like to leave it open to the different countries.
 

Question:  What do you mean by national position?  You started to refer to his national position?
 

Spokesperson:  No, it’s the fact that the death penalty is authorized.

 

(...)

 

Question:  On the question of the death penalty -- how does that statement that Mr. Ban wants to leave it open to those countries that recognize the death penalty to do that -– how is that consistent with the UN’s opposition to capital punishment?
 

Spokesperson:  Well, as I said, he stated both today and the general position of the UN stands. 
 

Question:  But why did Mr. Ban want to make an exception for those countries that do recognize the death penalty if the position of the Organization is to be opposed to it?
 

Spokesperson:  If you need more clarifications on his part, I will ask him to provide them.

 

(...)

 

Question:  On the first day, isn’t he sending a mixed message on the Iraq death penalty situation?  You have a Special Representative saying “we oppose it, it’s a violation” –- all of that –- and then the Secretary-General comes in and says:  “Well, it’s up to every country”.  On his first day in office, you have this man [talkover] Does the UN want to get more involved in Iraq or does it not want to?

 

Spokesperson:  I don’t think this was the issue.  The issue was the actual execution, and he stressed, when he started the statement –- let me stress that -– he said first we have to think of the victims, which means that the need for justice was stressed from the start of his statement.

 

(...)


[OHCHR - Press Release] 

 

HIGH COMMISSIONER RENEWS CALL FOR RESTRAINT IN IRAQ

 

3 January 2007

 

UN 인권최고대표, 이라크에 자제할 것 재차 촉구

 

2007. 1. 3.

 

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, today renewed her call for restraint by the Government of Iraq in the execution of sentences of death imposed by the Iraqi High Tribunal. On 28 December 2006, alongside the confirmation of the death sentence of Saddam Hussein, the death sentences of two other co-defendants, Awad Hamad Al-Bandar and Barzan Ibrahim Al-Hassan, were also upheld on appeal. “International law, as it currently stands, only allows the imposition of the death penalty as an exceptional measure within rigorous legal constraints. The concerns that I expressed just days ago with respect to the fairness and impartiality of Saddam Hussein’s trial apply also to these two defendants”, the High Commissioner said. “I have therefore today directly appealed to the President of the Republic of Iraq to refrain from carrying out these sentences.”The High Commissioner also noted that under Iraq’s international obligations, it is bound to afford Awad Hamad Al-Bandar and Barzan Ibrahim Al-Hassan the opportunity to seek commutation or pardon of the sentence.


 

[UN News]

UN human rights chief calls on Iraq not to hang co-defendants of Saddam

UN 인권수장, 이라크후세인의 공동피고인들 사형집행하지 말 것 촉구

 

Louise Arbour

3 January 2007 – The top United Nations human rights official appealed directly to Iraqi President Jalal Talabani today not to execute two high-ranking colleagues of former president Saddam Hussein, who was hanged on Saturday.

“International law, as it currently stands, only allows the imposition of the death penalty as an exceptional measure within rigorous legal constraints,” UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour said referring to the scheduled hanging of two of Mr. Hussein’s co-defendants, Awad Hamad Al-Bandar and Barzan Ibrahim Al-Hassan.

“The concerns that I expressed just days ago with respect to the fairness and impartiality of Saddam Hussein’s trial apply also to these two defendants, she added in a statement. “I have therefore today directly appealed to the President of the Republic of Iraq to refrain from carrying out these sentences.”

Noting that the death sentences on the two were upheld together with that on Mr. Hussein, Ms. Arbour said that under Iraq’s international obligations, the country is bound to afford the two the opportunity to seek commutation or pardon of the sentences.

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon fully endorsed Ms. Arbour’s call for restraint, his spokesperson Michele Montas told the daily news briefing in New York.

“The Secretary-General is of course aware of the ongoing debate concerning a total ban of the death penalty,” she said.

“Until the matter is resolved, he respects the right of Member States to have their own positions on it. However, the Secretary-General strongly believes in the wisdom of Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states ‘Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person,’” she added.

On the eve of Mr. Hussein’s execution Ms. Arbour likewise appealed to Iraq to avoid precipitously in light of concerns over the fairness of his trial.

“The appeal judgment is a lengthy and complex decision that requires careful study,” she said in a statement on Friday. “There were a number of concerns as to the fairness of the original trial, and there needs to be assurance that these issues have been comprehensively addressed. I call therefore on the Iraqi authorities not to act precipitately in seeking to execute the sentence in these cases.”

She noted that international law proscribes the imposition of the death sentence after an unfair trial. “All sections of Iraqi society, as well as the wider international community, have an interest in ensuring that a death sentence provided for in Iraqi law is only imposed following a trial and appeal process that is, and is legitimately seen as, fair, credible and impartial. That is especially so in a case as exceptional as this one,” she added.

She pointed out that under international treaties that Iraq has signed, Mr. Hussein had the right to appeal to the appropriate authorities for consideration of commutation or pardon.


Daily Noon Press Briefing

 

3 January 2007

 


대변인 일일 정오 브리핑

 

2007. 1. 3.

03 January 07

Daily Noon Press Briefing: By the Office of the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.
[Webcast: Archived Video - 35 minutes ]

 

[1:38 - 3:30]

[7:50 - 9:20]
[10:30 - 11:23]
[15:25 - 17:58]
[18:18 - 18:52]
[23:21 - 24:09]
[24:54 - 27:20]
[28:18 - 28:53]
[35:05 - 33:51]


 

 

3 January 2007

DAILY PRESS BRIEFING BY THE OFFICE OF THE SPOKESPERSON FOR THE SECRETARY-GENERAL


2007. 1. 3.

UN 사무총장 대변인실 일일 브리핑

 

(...)

 

The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights -– this is now about Iraq -- Louise Arbour, today renewed her call for restraint by the Government of Iraq in the execution of death sentences that have been imposed by the Iraqi High Tribunal.  Last week, the death sentences of two of Saddam Hussein’s co-defendants, Awad Hamad Al-Bandar and Barzan Ibrahim Al-Hassan, were upheld on appeal.

 

Arbour underlined that international law, as it currently stands, only allows the imposition of the death penalty as an exceptional measure within rigorous legal constraints.  Given that her concerns about the fairness and impartiality of Saddam Hussein’s trial apply also to the other two defendants, the High Commissioner today directly appealed to the Iraqi President to refrain from carrying out these sentences.

 

We have her full statement upstairs.

 

I was asked several questions yesterday, questions about the Secretary-General’s view on capital punishment, and I have since spoken with him this morning about that topic, and I have a few things to add.

 

The Secretary-General is, of course, aware of the ongoing debate in the General Assembly concerning a total ban of the death penalty.  Until the matter is resolved, he respects the right of Member States to have their own positions on it.

 

However, the Secretary-General strongly believes in the wisdom of article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.”

 

In that context, he fully endorses the call made today by Louise Arbour for restraint by the Government of Iraq in the execution of the death sentences imposed by the Iraqi High Tribunal.

 

(...)

 

Question:  As far as the execution -- the question of execution -- the Secretary-General just issued a statement.  Does that mean that the Secretary-General has in fact corrected his position by supporting what is mentioned in the Geneva Convention?  And does he still stick by the fact that it is up to the Member States to decide who to hang, who not to hang?

 

Spokesperson:  I think yesterday he was acknowledging the fact that, as you know, there is no consensus at the United Nations over the issue of the death penalty.  There was a debate at the General Assembly a few years ago and it ended up with the majority of Member States opting for –- refusing to condemn the death penalty.

 

He recognizes the fact that we are trying to work towards the abolition of that practice.  However, he acknowledges also the fact that Member States have their positions on the issue.

 

Question:  Yes, Michele.  Just two things, one briefly a follow-up on that, Louise Arbour’s statement, questions of fairness of the process.  It sounded like the Secretary-General yesterday was, to a certain degree, defending the process and saying that Iraq was dealing –- the Iraqis were dealing with their past.  Is he essentially –- is it his position that this process by which Saddam Hussein has been tried and executed is not there?

 

(...)

 

And you had another question before…

 

Correspondent:  Does the Secretary-General, it’s his view, are you saying, that he does not view the process that led to the trial and execution of Saddam Hussein, that it was essentially questions about its fairness?

 

Spokesperson:  Well, we discussed this with him.  He was talking simply about the executions.  He was not talking about whether the trial was fair or not.  I think in this specific case, he already supported this morning the statement made by Louise Arbour.  And as you know, Louise Arbour also mentioned the fact that there are practices in the international courts condemning executions.  But she also acknowledges that there are differences within Member States about this situation.

 

(...)

 

Question:  This afternoon, human rights groups, including Human Rights Watch have criticized the Secretary-General’s statement on the execution of Saddam Hussein.  Does he have any response to those statements?

 

Spokesperson:  Well, I already gave his statement on the issue. 

 

Question:  But what are his views on the trial of Saddam Hussein?

 

Spokesperson:  He has not expressed his view on the trials.  He has supported today the call that Ms. Arbour sent to the Iraqi Government and that he was very strongly behind Ms. Arbour on this.  His opinion is that we should press for the abolition of capital punishment, but it should be a slow process, as you know.

 

Question:  But what are his views?  Ms. Arbour has given her views, but what are his views?

 

Spokesperson:  On the actual trial?

 

Question:  On the actual trial and execution.

 

Spokesperson:  He said what he thought in terms of the executions.  In terms of the trial, he has not expressed his views on it yet.

 

Question:  Just to follow up on that.  The Secretary-General was speaking yesterday at a time many world countries were issuing statements condemning even the process that Saddam went through.  So did it come across his mind that when he made his statements he undermines his position as an objective Secretary-General for this Organization?  And considering the statement that came from Iraq, from Mr. Ashraf Qazi who probably what we stated more, you know, what we know about the UN position.

 

Spokesperson:  Well, I think he…

 

Question:  When you spoke to him this morning what did he tell you?  Isn’t he worried now that people think he’s not really an objective Secretary-General, he’s more [inaudible]?

 

Spokesperson:  I think his statement here was clear.  I think it should be taken –- yesterday there was -- the complete statement does talk about, you know, the usual practice in humanitarian law and it does mention the larger picture.  I don’t think it’s fair to say that he’s changing his views or anything of that sort.  I think he’s clarified.  You had asked me to ask him to clarify his views and I think he did.

 

Question:  So what does he think of the Saddam, like versus this -– the Vatican issued a statement about last minute procedures.  What does he think?

 

Spokesperson:  [Inaudible] specifics in terms of the trial itself and what led to the execution, the times preceding the immediate execution.

 

(...)

 

Question:  I have a question; it’s obviously a period of transition here at the UN. I’m just curious about the future of Louise Arbour and her job.  Where do things stand with the new Secretary-General?

 

Spokesperson:  Well, we don’t know yet.  As I said yesterday and I will say it again today, there is going to be a review process –- all senior managers in their different positions -– and you should know more about this in a few weeks.

 

[The Spokesperson’s Office later clarified that Ms. Arbour’s current tenure is a four-year tenure, which was approved by the General Assembly and which ends in July 2008.]

 

Question:  How confident is he of Louise Arbour’s performance?

 

Spokesperson:  You heard him support Louise Arbour’s position today.

 

(...)

 

Question:  What was his view on the, how his death penalty quote…

 

Spokesperson:  …was received?  That’s why he wanted this morning to make, you know, to stress the fact that he supports definitely what we have in the Covenant of Human Rights, and he supports what has been the, let’s say, the tradition in the human rights bodies of the United Nations and the international courts.

 

Question:  …he made a mistake?

 

Spokesperson:  No, he didn’t say he made a mistake.  He said that, you know, he is a representative of 192 countries and there are 192 countries who disagree on the death penalty.  That was all, I think.  I think it was maybe, might have been blown a little bit out of the proportion he meant. 

 

(...)

 

Question:  Michele, you just sort of referred in passing to the fact that Ban Ki-moon supports the abolition of the death penalty, which sounds like an extremely strong position.  Did he say that this morning to you?  I mean, where does that come, where did he express support for the abolition of the death penalty?
 

Spokesperson:  Well, I think he did express it in his comments this morning when he spoke to me, and his comments when he mentioned the fact that Ms. Arbour spoke about those two executions to be taking place shortly.  I think he did, to me, it was important to him to stress that he was going along with what humanitarian law says.  And, he was going along with what have been traditional UN practices pushing towards the abolition…

 

Question:  So, he made it clear that he believes that we should, the UN should move towards the abolition of capital punishment?

 

Spokesperson:  Yes.

 

Question:  [talkover]

 

Spokesperson:  Well, we have the Covenant on Human Rights…

 

Question:  Well, the Covenant on Human Rights actually says, actually states where the death penalty is legal, it should happen only in the worst cases and he cited specifically that this, that Saddam’s were the most heinous crimes, so that sounds like, to me, like one of the worst cases, so I don’t understand.  Where… [talkover]…

 

Spokesperson:  You mentioned yourself that there are cases where…

 

Question:  It seems to me that according to that Covenant it allows executions only in the worst cases, but it allows executions [talkover]…

 

Spokesperson:  You have also the individual laws of countries.  Let’s face it -- we have 192 Member States in this Organization. 

 

Question:  Excuse me ma’am, Ms. Arbour issued that [inaudible] statement before Saddam’s execution, and I am sure Mr. Secretary-General had enough time to do his research before taking his position.  Why didn’t he call for similar restraint yesterday, instead of openly supporting the execution of Saddam?

 

Spokesperson:  You know, Ms. Arbour is the High Commissioner for Human Rights.  It is her job.

 

Question:  You are the UN position.  This is not something new…

 

Spokesperson:  But he acknowledged simply that there were Member States who had different practices and different laws.

 

(...)

 

Question:  What is his position –- I understand he supports the abolition of the death penalty -- but what is his position on a moratorium of the death penalty?  Does he think that it is feasible that the General Assembly, for instance, passes a resolution on a moratorium?

 

Spokesperson:  Well, this is a prerogative of the General Assembly.  Once the General Assembly sets such a decision, takes such a decision, I think the Secretary-General will certainly carry it forward and push it forward.

 

(...)

 

Question:  One last question in addition to that.  Just back to the death penalty:  is it correct that the United Nations defers to national law on internal matters, especially when there is no global treaty or convention?  I mean, is it not up to individual States to set their own laws?

 

Spokesperson:  Yes, it is the case, and this is what was referred to yesterday by the Secretary-General.

 

Question:  It sounds that perhaps Mr. Ban is stepping away from that?

 

Spokesperson:  I don’t think he’s stepping away from that.  I think it is a common position here.

 

(...)


[The New York Times]

 

January 3, 2007

New U.N. Chief Invites Controversy by Declining to Oppose Hussein Execution

2007. 1. 3.

신임 UN 수장, 사담 후세인 사형집행에 반대 안해 논란

UNITED NATIONS, Jan. 2 — On his first day of work as secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, the mild-spoken South Korean diplomat who had suggested he would bring new caution to the post, invited controversy by declining to criticize the death penalty applied to Saddam Hussein.

Mr. Ban commented on the execution of Mr. Hussein just after entering United Nations headquarters on Tuesday morning to start his job.

“Saddam Hussein was responsible for committing heinous crimes and unspeakable atrocities against the Iraqi people,” Mr. Ban said in response to questions from a crush of reporters outside the Security Council’s chambers. “We should never forget the victims of his crimes, “ he said.

“The issue of capital punishment is for each and every member state to decide,” he added.

“While I am firmly against impunity, I also hope the members of the international community should pay due regard to all aspects of international humanitarian laws.”

Mr. Ban’s remarks appeared to contradict bedrock United Nations policy opposing the death penalty on human rights grounds.

He seemed to have tripped in his effort to tread lightly on the political views of the many United Nations members.

The remarks also seemed to show that Mr. Ban, who was South Korea’s foreign minister when he was chosen in October as secretary general, had not completed the transition from representing his country to leading the United Nations.

Michèle Montas, Mr. Ban’s spokeswoman, said the death penalty was legal in South Korea.

On Dec. 30, hours after Mr. Hussein was hanged, the United Nations special representative for Iraq, Ashraf Qazi, said in Baghdad that although the United Nations “understands the desire for justice felt by many Iraqis,” it could not support the execution.

“Based on the principle of respect for the right to life,” Mr. Qazi said, “the United Nations remains opposed to capital punishment, even in the case of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.”

Ms. Montas, whose first day on the job also was Tuesday, said Mr. Ban had not intended to change United Nations policy, but had added his own “nuance.” Mr. Hussein was hanged in a hasty execution at dawn on Dec. 30, in a chamber where many Iraqis had been killed under his brutal rule.

In public comments before his first meeting with United Nations staff, Mr. Ban said, “We have to show the international community that we are ready and eager to change.” He said the organization had faced “harsh and sometimes unfair criticism,” and acknowledged that “staff morale has plummeted.” But he said United Nations workers must be ready to “multitask” and to move frequently from armchair jobs at headquarters in New York into the field.

“My watchword will be meritocracy,” he said, in words that should be well received by the Bush administration, which backed Mr. Ban to succeed Kofi Annan, who served two five-year terms, in part because of Mr. Ban’s pledges to streamline the United Nations bureaucracy.

In veiled words, Mr. Ban seemed to hint that he would not overreach his power, but that he expected cooperation from the United States. Speaking of the many crises facing the organization, he said, “Not a single person, including the secretary general of the United Nations; not a single country, however strong, powerful, resourceful, maybe, can address this.”


Source:

http://www.un.org/webcast/2007.html

http://www.un.org/sg/offthecuff/index.asp?nid=964

http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=21137

http://www.un.org/press/en/2007/db070102.doc.htm

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=2937

http://www.un.org/press/en/2007/db070103.doc.htm

http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=21147 

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/03/world/middleeast/03nations.html